lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Date Fri, 09 Sep 2016 17:52:07 GMT
Ok; thanks Anshum.

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:40 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:

> Hey David,
>
> I'm just about to update the website and send out the notification for
> 5.5.3 in a few hours (as soon as I get some time at work). About the
> section, I assume you are talking about the CHANGES.txt file and I
> should've done that as part of the release process but I think I missed the
> 5x, and master branches. I've added the 5.5.3 section to both, and moved
> your entry to a new 5.5.4 section on the 5x branch.
> 5.5.4 section addition on branch_5_5 is a part of the post-release
> process, so I'll remember to move this to the correct section when I add
> that.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:17 AM David Smiley <david.w.smiley@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Anhum,
>> Minutes ago I went and committed
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7417 to master, branch_6x,
>> branch_5x, and branch_5_5.  While on both the v5 branches, I noticed the
>> last 5.5.x was specifically 5.5.2 so I went and added this under a new
>> 5.5.3.   That is now committed.  Then the realization hits me that you're
>> doing a 5.5.3 release and it just passed a vote  So I guess I should change
>> those entries to be 5.5.4 and probably also add a blank 5.5.3 section so
>> it's clear there were not additions in 5.5.3 for Lucene?  BTW I think this
>> bug is "minor" IMO.
>> ~ David
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:29 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The release notes (draft) can be found here:
>>>
>>> Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote553
>>> Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote553
>>>
>>> Please feel free to edit/fix it.
>>>
>>> -Anshum
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM David Smiley <david.w.smiley@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Okay.  BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
>>>> those using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong.  We don't want to raise
>>>> alarm bells too loudly :-)
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>>>>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>>>>
>>>>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>>>>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>>>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>>>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>>>
>>> --
>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>
> --
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

Mime
View raw message