lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
Subject Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Date Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:37:25 GMT
Thanks Uwe.

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:47 AM Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:

> Hi Anshum,
>
>
>
> I will now enable the tests for 5.5 branch on Jenkins!
>
>
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> -----
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:anshum@anshumgupta.net]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 7:01 PM
> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
>
>
>
> With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to
> resume the 5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an
> RC out on Wednesday.
>
>
>
> -Anshum
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
> UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for
> SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any
> clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
> I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are
> objections.
>
>
>
> @Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if it
> makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <pushkar.raste@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well
>
> On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
> to that branch as well.
>
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading
> to
> > unstable state in Solr.
> >
> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests.
> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <david.w.smiley@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Okay.  BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
> those
> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong.  We don't want to raise alarm
> >> bells too loudly :-)
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
> >>>
> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Anshum Gupta
> >>
> >> --
> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Anshum Gupta
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Anshum Gupta
>
>

Mime
View raw message