lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Proposal to Move Solr Ref Guide off Confluence
Date Mon, 22 Aug 2016 14:39:06 GMT
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 9:46 AM Jan H√łydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:

> Pull requests for docs is a great plus so more people can contribute. The
> online version-specific docs can then have a link below each page
> encouraging people to contribute through PR to version-branch or by comment
> system.
>
> An issue with only maintaining the next-release branch is that docs on
> master will get out of date. But that is perhaps not a problem since there
> will not be an online HTML version of master? Anyway, with a merge-forward
> strategy, we could e.g. merge to master after each point release on 6.x, to
> avoid the gap becoming too large over time.
>

Yup; +1!  I think that's how we should do it.

-- 
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

Mime
View raw message