lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9180) need cloud equivilent of TestPseudoReturnFields
Date Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:57:21 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Hoss Man updated SOLR-9180:
---------------------------
    Attachment: SOLR-9180.patch

work in progress patch...

TestPseudoReturnFields has some asserts that claim they "also check real-time-get from transaction
log" -- but the test setup is going out of it's way to disable the updateLog (blaming schema12.xml
for not suppporting {{\_version\_}})

When i tried to fix this to do a true RTG against uncommitted data, I encountered what appears
to be a legitimate bug using a psuedo-fields in that situtation -- so as i've been making
my way building up a new "TestCloudPseudoReturnFields" i've been keeping an eye out for opportunities
to add more RTG equivilences of the existing search+asserts as well (in both single node and
cloud mode situations) and it looks like there's more then one bug in each situation.

(You can see the problematic assertions in the patch, but the tests due currently pass due
to strategically placed  {{Assume}} calls to prevent the problematic assertions from running
-- that way new failures jump out at me easier as i beef up the test(s))


> need cloud equivilent of TestPseudoReturnFields
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-9180
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9180
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Test
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Assignee: Hoss Man
>         Attachments: SOLR-9180.patch
>
>
> on the mailing list, Charles Sanders noted that the {{[explain]}} transformer wasn't
working in Solr 5(.5.1) - showing a sample query that indicated he was using SolrCloud.
> In 6.0 and on master this works fine, so whatever bug affects 5.x was fixed at some point
-- but we don't appear to have any cloud based tests that invoke {{[explain]}}, so we should
add something akin to TestPseudoReturnFields to ensure no regressions in the future.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message