lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Rowe (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7271) Cleanup jira's concept of 'master' and '6.0'
Date Fri, 06 May 2016 16:37:12 GMT


Steve Rowe commented on LUCENE-7271:

bq. I'd really prefer not discuss 5.x/6x anymore in this jira and confuse/complicate the issue

I created LUCENE-7275 for this.

> Cleanup jira's concept of 'master' and '6.0'
> --------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-7271
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Assignee: Hoss Man
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7271_S1_report.csv, LUCENE-7271_S1_report.xls
> Jira's concept of "Fix Version: master" is currently screwed up, as noted & discussed
in this mailing list thread...
> The current best plan of attack (summary) is:
> * use Jira's "Merge Versions" feature to merge {{master}} into {{6.0}}
> * add a new {{master (7.0)}} to use moving forward
> * manually audit/fix the fixVersion of some clean up issues as needed.
> I'm using this issue to track this work.
> ----
> Detailed Check list of planned steps:
> * S1: Generate a CSV report listing all resolved/closed Jira's with 'fixVersion=master
AND fixVersion=6.1'
> **
> *** currently about ~100 issues
> ** The operating assumption is that any non-resolved issues should have the fixVersion
set correctly if/when they are resolved in the future
> * S2: Use Jira's "Bulk Edit" feature to add comments *W/O SENDING EMAIL* to every issue
currently assocaited with fixVersion=6.0 or fixVersio=master
> ** The comments will include unique strings based on the the specific query done, and
will map the list back to this issue (ex {{LUCENE-7271_20160503_master}} and {{LUCENE-7271_20160503_60}})
> ** These comments will serve as a backup plan making it possible to find all issues affected
(by merging jira's concepts of 'master' and '6.0') after the fact if need be.
> ** Queries to use for bulk edits:
> *** master:
> *** 6.0:
> * S3: Use Jira's "Merge Versions" feature to merge "master" into "6.0"
> ** This needs to be done distinctly for both LUCENE and SOLR
> * S4: Add a new "master (7.0)" version to Jira
> ** This needs to be done distinctly for both LUCENE and SOLR
> * S5: audit every issue in the CSV file from S1 above to determine if/when the issue
should get fixVersion="master (7.0)" *added* to it or fixVersion="6.0" *removed* from it:
> ** if it only ever had commits to master (ie: before branch_6x was made on March 2nd)
then no action needed.
> ** if it has distinct commits to both master after branch_6x was made on March 2nd, then
fixVersion="master (7.0)" should definitely be added.
> ** if it has no commits to branch_6_0, and the only commits to branch_6x are after branch_6_0
was created on March 3rd, then fixVersion="6.0" should be removed.
> ** if there are no obvious commits in the issue comments, then sanity check why it has
any fixVersion at all (can't reproduce? dup? etc...)
> * S6: Audit CHANGES.txt & git commits and *replace* fixVersion=6.0 with fixVersion="master
(7.0)" on the handful of issues where appropriate in case they fell through the cracks in
> ** Look at the 7.0 section of lucene/CHANGES.txt & solr/CHANGES.txt for new features
> *** currently only 1 jira mentioned in either files in 7.0 section
> ** Use {{git co releases/lucene-solr/6.0.0 && git cherry -v master | egrep '^\+'}}
to find changesets on master that were not included in 6.0
> *** currently ~40 commits
> ** before removing fixVersion=6.0 from any of these issues, sanity check if this is a
deprecation type situation (involving diff commits in both 6.0 and master) in which case fixVersion="master
(7.0)" should be _added_ in addition to fixVersion=6.0

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message