lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ishan Chattopadhyaya (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8339) SolrDocument and SolrInputDocument should have a common interface
Date Wed, 25 Nov 2015 04:48:11 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15026180#comment-15026180
] 

Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-8339:
--------------------------------------------

Is there a historic reason for not having a common interface/abstract class for SolrDocument
and SolrInputDocument?
Since having this right now might break backcompat, does it make sense to do this for 6.0?
Right now, the motivation for doing this is SOLR-8220, but not strictly needed.

> SolrDocument and SolrInputDocument should have a common interface
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-8339
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8339
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message