Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BED69102A7 for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 13:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56725 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2015 13:59:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 56661 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2015 13:59:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 56649 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2015 13:59:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2015 13:59:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: message received from 54.164.171.186 which is an MX secondary for dev@lucene.apache.org) Received: from [54.164.171.186] (HELO mx1-us-east.apache.org) (54.164.171.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2015 13:59:20 +0000 Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com (mail-la0-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E9ADE43E3B for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 13:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by labbd9 with SMTP id bd9so128163165lab.2 for ; Tue, 05 May 2015 06:58:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cXeZvUtJ3QnkbmGv3PpNQZjRA+LxYUusO1VK1iyhkE4=; b=H2VrGjRXonYsFIK4jlXZ285i5cy+mP9/huYOcl2k7k6arGd69Tp2amM48TXK0L0ghY IfOLvwge+ZAlkqsxZaMbixnr38ZasIxNxuEEmynn/eayhjAEdctZoyUuAuZbmCxmYNwF 0QEvZDRjbNpkbfnTpKdeXwQGuXyZoHP0zk+Y4Lr0W8EVSRwXXPDd4UG+6jWU4XpFI307 i6yI4h1PkyjWV1YetrqP8EsGy3sgmPnDl9LutVvUJBVdZJ3SV+hgXLD+oOGH/+c8SipJ EAE8yycxBTj0ujOmO1PAHA92ZuSJ3tntVccpHEbmwkh05gBgsKLW9QRKtv2ALX503TWe l+6w== X-Received: by 10.152.224.164 with SMTP id rd4mr1181586lac.77.1430834338795; Tue, 05 May 2015 06:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Per-Steffensens-MacBook-Pro.local (87-104-178-112-dynamic-customer.profibernet.dk. [87.104.178.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ew6sm4082806lbc.40.2015.05.05.06.58.58 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 May 2015 06:58:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Per Steffensen X-Google-Original-From: Per Steffensen Message-ID: <5548CCA1.1070509@designware.dk> Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 15:58:57 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Running 5.1.0 test-suite via maven References: <5539FDC3.6000406@designware.dk> <553DF245.4050308@designware.dk> <8AF47D91-8B33-407D-8877-88BD14E6428E@liace.dk> <5548BC21.300@designware.dk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 05/05/15 15:05, Dawid Weiss wrote: > I'm part of Apache Lucene and I try to make every release meet quality > standards, but Solr tests are quite complex and have had a long > history of being very difficult to fix. If you search mailing list > archives you'll see at least a few attempts and continuous efforts > from various people aiming at stabilizing these test. Yes, I know too well > > This said, if you're asking whether there was a "green" light before the release > then yes Yes, that was what would expect, and therefor kept thinking that it must be something with out build-environment. And therefore likely no need for a JIRA > -- anybody who votes for the release to proceed ran the > smoketester and this in turn runs all the tests. But machines and > environments vary. I don't know anybody who'd run development runs as > root, for example (which you apparently did). Yes, that is clearly a mistake > > The problems you initially experienced were your environment setup > problems (different compile JDK compared to runtime JDK), they don't > have much to do with Solr tests too. Exactly > > Dawid Regards, Per Steffensen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org