lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anshum Gupta (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7275) Pluggable authorization module in Solr
Date Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:50:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14494296#comment-14494296
] 

Anshum Gupta commented on SOLR-7275:
------------------------------------

bq. Do the initialization and other things of Authorization plugin in CoreContainer
Sure, I'll move it.

bq. why multiple json files? /security.json and /simplesecurity.json ?
They are used for 2 different reasons, the /security.json is the one used for/by Solr's framework
whereas /simplesecurity.json could also be called anything else tomorrow and is used by a
specific implementation. Doesn't make any sense to merge the 2 and Solr be bothered about
a specific plugin data.

bq. Why should a component use SolrZkClient directly to read configuration?
Is there a reason not to? The client would need information about zk and also might need to
read information about it, I don't see a reason why we should create a new zkclient there.

> Pluggable authorization module in Solr
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-7275
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7275
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Anshum Gupta
>            Assignee: Anshum Gupta
>         Attachments: SOLR-7275.patch
>
>
> Solr needs an interface that makes it easy for different authorization systems to be
plugged into it. Here's what I plan on doing:
> Define an interface {{SolrAuthorizationPlugin}} with one single method {{isAuthorized}}.
This would take in a {{SolrRequestContext}} object and return an {{SolrAuthorizationResponse}}
object. The object as of now would only contain a single boolean value but in the future could
contain more information e.g. ACL for document filtering etc.
> The reason why we need a context object is so that the plugin doesn't need to understand
Solr's capabilities e.g. how to extract the name of the collection or other information from
the incoming request as there are multiple ways to specify the target collection for a request.
Similarly request type can be specified by {{qt}} or {{/handler_name}}.
> Flow:
> Request -> SolrDispatchFilter -> isAuthorized(context) -> Process/Return.
> {code}
> public interface SolrAuthorizationPlugin {
>   public SolrAuthorizationResponse isAuthorized(SolrRequestContext context);
> }
> {code}
> {code}
> public  class SolrRequestContext {
>   UserInfo; // Will contain user context from the authentication layer.
>   HTTPRequest request;
>   Enum OperationType; // Correlated with user roles.
>   String[] CollectionsAccessed;
>   String[] FieldsAccessed;
>   String Resource;
> }
> {code}
> {code}
> public class SolrAuthorizationResponse {
>   boolean authorized;
>   public boolean isAuthorized();
> }
> {code}
> User Roles: 
> * Admin
> * Collection Level:
>   * Query
>   * Update
>   * Admin
> Using this framework, an implementation could be written for specific security systems
e.g. Apache Ranger or Sentry. It would keep all the security system specific code out of Solr.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message