lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6367) Can PrefixQuery subclass AutomatonQuery?
Date Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:43:53 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14383528#comment-14383528
] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6367:
---------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1669526 from [~mikemccand] in branch 'dev/branches/branch_5x'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1669526 ]

LUCENE-6367: PrefixQuery now subclasses AutomatonQuery

> Can PrefixQuery subclass AutomatonQuery?
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6367
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6367
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: Trunk, 5.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-6367.patch, LUCENE-6367.patch
>
>
> Spinoff/blocker for LUCENE-5879.
> It seems like PrefixQuery should "simply" be an AutomatonQuery rather than specializing
its own TermsEnum ... with maybe some performance improvements to ByteRunAutomaton.run to
short-circuit once it's in a "sink state", AutomatonTermsEnum could be just as fast as PrefixTermsEnum.
> If we can do this it will make LUCENE-5879 simpler.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message