Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70BDD17560 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 19:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26540 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2015 19:56:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 26471 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2015 19:56:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 26448 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2015 19:56:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 19:56:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of erik.hatcher@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.44] (HELO mail-qa0-f44.google.com) (209.85.216.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 19:55:53 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id bm13so16996164qab.3 for ; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 11:53:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to; bh=yvaHOR4PzHlP8iXZfczi1YUmeRfjSMf5aBiIwBoDeQA=; b=cANzdYbkvUKcv65VlyOmHYPtMOFmukVk72F3j4d+GIZa9dB+7beIHPDw/XwimXqP9f Vjo0r3WJrxA7ZGWITMRhYSbsyGKJA8y4sKK34G/GARdmebCFyKFUpaC2gmZXr3WdDRgF TBWQs7oEsjbLNf2JlIqifx3DtdBY+peRj1S4KV080nFswjQd9+Mk8lNqqImQwslq4Ovx ge01wJF0zE21fTT2QILz2Y3II4Gw+JclIVh5A6qYs6sJNYXk9B1AO6tWzxp9k4fCuIvi VAGUr7MUjWHsPwx4xZSIkw5ST3Rmx9Acrivir/M+ISD8Ibrhn91YWAhpJXal+IVLJ6YD dBgw== X-Received: by 10.140.106.198 with SMTP id e64mr140079020qgf.19.1420574016499; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 11:53:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.96.245] ([216.197.66.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b13sm43390316qaw.31.2015.01.06.11.53.35 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Jan 2015 11:53:36 -0800 (PST) From: Erik Hatcher Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_84076CEC-0DD2-4C3D-B4FC-D1C2555E7336" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Subject: Re: Apache Lucene/Solr 5.0 (alpha)? Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 14:53:35 -0500 References: To: dev@lucene.apache.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail=_84076CEC-0DD2-4C3D-B4FC-D1C2555E7336 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 sounds good, I=E2=80=99m +1 - 5.0 is a big deal and it=E2=80=99ll be = good to get the =E2=80=9C5.0-FINAL=E2=80=9D as solid as possible. = Having an alpha release would surely get a larger number of folks trying = it out. Erik > On Jan 6, 2015, at 2:48 PM, Anshum Gupta = wrote: >=20 > I'd like to suggest that we call the next release 5.0 alpha and follow = it with either 5.0 or 5.0 beta (if need be) on the lines of the 4x = releases.=20 >=20 > As for the history behind calling it that, here's a post about the 4.0 = alpha release that should clarify things I'm thinking about. >=20 > http://lucidworks.com/blog/4-0-alpha-whats-in-a-name/ = >=20 > Again, this would be a stable, production release. Like all other = public releases but would give us the freedom to change APIs that need = to be changed. >=20 > Thoughts? >=20 > --=20 > Anshum Gupta > http://about.me/anshumgupta --Apple-Mail=_84076CEC-0DD2-4C3D-B4FC-D1C2555E7336 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 sounds good, I=E2=80=99m +1 - 5.0 is a big deal and it=E2=80=99= ll be good to get the =E2=80=9C5.0-FINAL=E2=80=9D as solid as possible. =  Having an alpha release would surely get a larger number of folks = trying it out.

= Erik

On Jan 6, 2015, at 2:48 PM, = Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:

I'd like to suggest that we call the next release 5.0 alpha = and follow it with either 5.0 or 5.0 beta (if need be) on the lines of = the 4x releases. 

As for the history behind calling it that, = here's a post about the 4.0 alpha release that should clarify things I'm = thinking about.

http://lucidworks.com/blog/4-0-alpha-whats-in-a-name/

Again, this would be a stable, production release. Like all = other public releases but would give us the freedom to change APIs that = need to be changed.

Thoughts?

--
Anshum = Gupta
http://about.me/anshumgupta

= --Apple-Mail=_84076CEC-0DD2-4C3D-B4FC-D1C2555E7336--