Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27F6211B3E for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19369 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2014 15:29:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 19300 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2014 15:29:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 19288 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2014 15:29:34 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:29:34 +0000 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:29:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Muir (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5940) change index backwards compatibility policy. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130141#comment-14130141 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5940: ------------------------------------- {quote} however, 5.0 should ideally continue to support 4.0-4.99 indexes (at least from the codec/index reading perspective) {quote} Who will do the work? Who will maintain this? Won't be me. > change index backwards compatibility policy. > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-5940 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Robert Muir > > Currently, our index backwards compatibility is unmanageable. The length of time in which we must support old indexes is simply too long. > The index back compat works like this: everyone wants it, but there are frequently bugs, and when push comes to shove, its not a very sexy thing to work on/fix, so its hard to get any help. > Currently our back compat "promise" is just a broken promise, because we cannot actually guarantee it for these reasons. > I propose we scale back the length of time for which we must support old indexes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org