lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-5988) Update SYSTEM_REQUIREMENTS.txt to mention Java 7
Date Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:02:16 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13970713#comment-13970713
] 

Uwe Schindler edited comment on SOLR-5988 at 4/16/14 12:01 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

bq. Do we need this file at all? It seems still in the trunk.

Yes, it is part of the HTML documentation, too. In trunk, the version is also Java 7, so the
file is correct for all 3 branches: trunk, branch_4x and lucene_solr_4_8.

bq. Also, I thought there were bugs in Java 7 and Update 1+ is no longer a recommended version,
but something released last week?

I will update this section together with the web site once our tests have finished. This goes
in line with my release schedule.

bq. It's not a "Problem" as such, just trying to see if something like this still has value
to the users or whether that information is better merged with where the users would actually
look for it (CHANGES, Release Notes, etc).

It is part of the main documentation, so every user will see it. Also the CHANGES.txt and
the release note will also contain it,

bq. Finally, the JavaBugs page, can we easily tell which of these issue still apply to Java
7. Or are they all now legacy for previous Solr release?

This page is up-to-date. It also contains a version number for every problem and if it is
fixed. The links there are up-to date and also "older" bugs still apply (like NIOFSDirectory
unuseable on Windows,...).


was (Author: thetaphi):
bq. Do we need this file at all? It seems still in the trunk.

Yes, it is part of the HTML documentation, too. The relase notes

bq. Also, I thought there were bugs in Java 7 and Update 1+ is no longer a recommended version,
but something released last week?

I will update this section together with the web site once our tests have finished. This goes
in line with my release schedule.

bq. It's not a "Problem" as such, just trying to see if something like this still has value
to the users or whether that information is better merged with where the users would actually
look for it (CHANGES, Release Notes, etc).

It is part of the main documentation, so every user will see it. Also the CHANGES.txt and
the release note will also contain it,

bq. Finally, the JavaBugs page, can we easily tell which of these issue still apply to Java
7. Or are they all now legacy for previous Solr release?

This page is up-to-date. It also contains a version number for every problem and if it is
fixed. The links there are up-to date and also "older" bugs still apply (like NIOFSDirectory
unuseable on Windows,...).

> Update SYSTEM_REQUIREMENTS.txt to mention Java 7
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5988
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5988
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: documentation
>    Affects Versions: 4.8
>            Reporter: Alexandre Rafalovitch
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: documentation
>             Fix For: 4.8
>
>
> Since Solr 4.8 will require Java 7 as a minimum, the description in the SYSTEM_REQUIREMENTS.txt
need to be updated too. 
> Or maybe it should be merged into release notes. All it will probably have is use Java
version after u56 (or whatever) and here is an obscure URL to known bugs (still valid for
Java 7?).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message