lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5587) TestSimpleTextDocValuesFormat.testMergeStability -seed 161C8BDA82B2190F
Date Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:38:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13964290#comment-13964290
] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5587:
---------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1585995 from mikemccand@apache.org in branch 'dev/branches/branch_4x'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1585995 ]

LUCENE-5587: fix SimpleText so its doc-values .dat files are same size regardless of order
that fields were added

> TestSimpleTextDocValuesFormat.testMergeStability -seed 161C8BDA82B2190F
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5587
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5587
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 4.8, 5.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-5587.patch
>
>
> Fails with this:
> {noformat}
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<{null=91, dat=39791, gen=36, pst=24, inf=697,
fld=14434}> but was:<{null=91, dat=39792, gen=36, pst=24, inf=697, fld=14434}>
> 	at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([161C8BDA82B2190F:6250CDF58F581BB9]:0)
> 	at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
> 	at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
> 	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
> 	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:147)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.index.BaseIndexFileFormatTestCase.testMergeStability(BaseIndexFileFormatTestCase.java:111)
> 	at org.apache.lucene.index.BaseDocValuesFormatTestCase.testMergeStability(BaseDocValuesFormatTestCase.java:70)
> {noformat}
> I'm digging ... it's because we add the DV fields in a different order for the 2nd index
... not sure why the other DVFs aren't affected (or maybe they are).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message