Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD0E9F613 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:53:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94297 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2013 17:53:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 94253 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2013 17:53:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 94245 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2013 17:53:16 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:53:16 +0000 Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:53:16 +0000 (UTC) From: "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4586) Increase default maxBooleanClauses MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13623852#comment-13623852 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4586: ------------------------------------ bq. Leave it in Solr as well, on the theory that if Lucene has a setting, Solr should provide access to it. Solr isn't a "Lucene configuration engine" - we don't allow for all of the flexibility that lucene provides, and never will. A setting should make sense on it's own. This particular setting no longer makes sense. I don't think it makes sense for Lucene or Solr, but the arguments need not be the same for both since the use cases are different. > Increase default maxBooleanClauses > ---------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-4586 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 4.2 > Environment: 4.3-SNAPSHOT 1456767M - ncindex - 2013-03-15 13:11:50 > Reporter: Shawn Heisey > Attachments: SOLR-4586.patch, SOLR-4586.patch, SOLR-4586.patch, SOLR-4586.patch > > > In the #solr IRC channel, I mentioned the maxBooleanClauses limitation to someone asking a question about queries. Mark Miller told me that maxBooleanClauses no longer applies, that the limitation was removed from Lucene sometime in the 3.x series. The config still shows up in the example even in the just-released 4.2. > Checking through the source code, I found that the config option is parsed and the value stored in objects, but does not actually seem to be used by anything. I removed every trace of it that I could find, and all tests still pass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org