lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Rowe (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (SOLR-4726) Factor out a minimal abstract class from IndexSchema/ManagedIndexSchema
Date Wed, 17 Apr 2013 03:31:16 GMT
Steve Rowe created SOLR-4726:
--------------------------------

             Summary: Factor out a minimal abstract class from IndexSchema/ManagedIndexSchema

                 Key: SOLR-4726
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4726
             Project: Solr
          Issue Type: Task
          Components: Schema and Analysis
            Reporter: Steve Rowe
            Priority: Minor


Spinoff from SOLR-3251.

[~rcmuir] wrote, on SOLR-4658 and SOLR-3251:

{quote}
If the goal is to have multiple implementations of indexschema (immutable ones backed by human
edited files, mutable ones saved to some opaque "database" that can be edited by REST), then
why not make IndexSchema abstract and pluggable from solrconfig.xml like anything else?
{quote}

{quote}
So IndexSchema becomes abstract and loaded just like other plugins, versus being a "wonder-do-it-all"
class. It would also
have the advantage of not having a bunch of options that have illegal combinations (e.g. managed+mutable)

Finally it makes it extensible: if someone wants to make their own impl that is powered by
microsoft access .MDB files then
they can do so.

(Also i think it would make backwards compatibility possible in case something changes in
drastic ways).
{quote}

{quote}
and it would also be a bonus in the future if somehow the backwards cruft existing in various
FieldType etc  apis (e.g. defaults and so on) were factored into the Classic guy to keep those
apis simpler...
{quote}

{quote}
>From a pluggability perspective it would be nice if e.g. addFields was factored down (e.g.
IndexSchema becomes abstract and minimal), and the immutable default impl threw UOE for changes
or whatever... But i know this is a lot of work, it would be a good followup issue and probably
good to do before schema gets any more hair (there is already tons of backwards cruft thrown
about it for compat etc too).
{quote}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message