lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Smiley (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (LUCENE-4895) Implement Spatial "disjoint" predicate.
Date Mon, 01 Apr 2013 21:31:15 GMT
David Smiley created LUCENE-4895:
------------------------------------

             Summary: Implement Spatial "disjoint" predicate.
                 Key: LUCENE-4895
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4895
             Project: Lucene - Core
          Issue Type: New Feature
          Components: modules/spatial
            Reporter: David Smiley
            Assignee: David Smiley
            Priority: Minor
             Fix For: 4.3


The "IsDisjointTo" SpatialOperation is not implemented for RecursivePrefixTreeStrategy and
some/all others(?). It has been very low priority because it is simply the inverse of "Intersects"
which is universally implemented on the SpatialStrategy implementations.  

* Should spatial "disjoint" count documents that have no spatial data?
* Arguably, there should be one implementation amongst the SpatialStrategies implemented in
terms of "Intersects"; this way each strategy need not deal with it.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message