lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tomás Fernández Löbbe <tomasflo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: New-style solr.xml
Date Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:56:53 GMT
It would be useful to have in the core.properties description, which of
those properties are required in which situation (e.g. "required when using
SolrCloud"), and all the default values.


On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com> wrote:

> Could you remove sharedLib and instead allow multiple <lib>my/path</lib>
> tags similar to in solrconfig.xml? See SOLR-4495
>
> +1 to prefixing sys.props with "solr." as we've done so far with
> solr.solr.home, solr.data.dir etc.
>
> Q: Should solr.xml be versioned as well, to handle future deprecation,
> back-compat etc?
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
>
> 15. apr. 2013 kl. 03:06 skrev Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com>:
>
> > Mark:
> >
> > OK, updated the example, I'd appreciate a quick glance to see if I put
> > the right properties in the solrcloud tag. Code fixes coming.
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> bq: What happened to the SolrCloud section?
> >>
> >> It wasn't in the bits I cut-n-pasted, so I didn't include it at all.
> >> Sheeesh! I'll fix, thanks for looking. It's amazing what I can fail to
> >> see.
> >>
> >> bq: sub-properties file
> >>
> >> Sounds like this is also really SOLR-4546, so maybe that's coming back?
> >>
> >> Erick
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Apr 14, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I've started a new page here:
> >>>>
> >>>> It's completely rudimentary, but I wanted to get it started so as many
> >>>> eyes as possible can get on it. See:
> >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond
> >>>
> >>> What happened to the SolrCloud section? I think that's a very helpful
> division.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Question:
> >>>> With the new style, does allowing cores.properties to specify an
> >>>> alternate instanceDir make any sense? I don't think so.
> >>>
> >>> Right, I don't either. These will be autodiscovered from a root
> location, not specified or overridable individually.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> What about the sub-properties file ('properties' property).
> >>>
> >>> I'd have to look to comment. Not familiar with that one.
> >>>
> >>> - Mark
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Erick
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message