Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB207F812 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26779 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2013 18:49:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 26542 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2013 18:49:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 26534 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2013 18:49:16 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:49:16 +0000 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:49:16 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mark Miller (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3706) Ship setup to log with log4j. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13609294#comment-13609294 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-3706: ----------------------------------- One thing that we would lose in tests with the current approach is [~yonik@apache.org]'s SolrLogFormatter. We would probably want to re-implement it. I'd much prefer that to trying to straddle different logging impls for example and tests. I think devs should see the logging users will see. And did I mention the single line logging? > Ship setup to log with log4j. > ----------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-3706 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3706 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Mark Miller > Assignee: Mark Miller > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.3, 5.0 > > Attachments: SOLR-3706-solr-log4j.patch, SOLR-3706-solr-log4j.patch > > > Currently we default to java util logging and it's terrible in my opinion. > *It's simple built in logger is a 2 line logger. > *You have to jump through hoops to use your own custom formatter with jetty - either putting your class in the start.jar or other pain in the butt solutions. > *It can't roll files by date out of the box. > I'm sure there are more issues, but those are the ones annoying me now. We should switch to log4j - it's much nicer and it's easy to get a nice single line format and roll by date, etc. > If someone wants to use JUL they still can - but at least users could start with something decent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org