lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Shai Erera (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4838) Add getOrd to BytesRefHash
Date Sat, 16 Mar 2013 21:22:14 GMT


Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4838:

bq. Maybe change to termID across the board?

I think bytesID would be better since it's a BytesRefHash. Nothing says it needs to denote
a term?

bq. can we use this method also in BytesRefHash#add(BytesRef bytes, int code)

Sure, I will. Maybe instead of getOrd/BytesID I should call it find(BytesRef bytes)?
> Add getOrd to BytesRefHash
> --------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-4838
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core/other
>            Reporter: Shai Erera
>            Assignee: Shai Erera
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4838.patch
> There is no API today to query BytesRefHash for the existence of a certain BytesRef.
Rather, you should use .add(), which looks up the given bytes, and hashes them if they are
not found, or returns their ord if they are found.
> I would like to add a simple getOrd API which will return the ord of a given BytesRef,
or -1 if not found. I would like to use that API in the facet module, and I need to be able
to query the hash without necessarily adding elements to it.
> I have a simple patch, will post shortly.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message