lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Ernst <>
Subject Re: Solr Log4j?
Date Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:43:29 GMT
Strongly in favor here!  I'm currently repackaging the war to use log4j
bindings and would love to avoid that step.

Really it seems like this should be an option in the build (since it must
be in the war, or at least if slf4j is in the war, then so must the
binding).  Like if there were an ant property you could set with -D that
says which binding you want?

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Ryan McKinley <> wrote:

> We have discussed a few times shipping with or supporting log4j rather
> then defaulting to JUL
> I just updated SOLR-3706 to do this.
> What are peoples thoughts on this issue now?
> Thanks
> Ryan

View raw message