Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE5E8DF08 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55694 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2013 13:49:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 55082 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2013 13:49:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 54935 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2013 13:49:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:49:13 +0000 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:49:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Simon Willnauer (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4770) GeoShape intersects filter omitted matching docs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13580610#comment-13580610 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-4770: ----------------------------------------- [~dsmiley] is this change backwards compatible? I mean if I used the unpatched version to index will I be able to search correctly with the new version? > GeoShape intersects filter omitted matching docs > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-4770 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4770 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: modules/spatial > Affects Versions: 4.0, 4.1 > Reporter: Florian Schilling > Assignee: David Smiley > Fix For: 4.2, 5.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-4770.patch, LUCENE-4770_Spatial_make_prefixTree_simplification_configurable.patch > > > SpatialPrefixTree#recursiveGetNodes uses an optimization that prevents > recursion into the deepest tree level if a parent node in the penultimate > level covers all its children. This produces a bug if the optimization > happens both at indexing and at query/filter time. > [Original post|https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/2626] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org