lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4485) Consider making QParsers throw SyntaxError if field being searched is not indexed
Date Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:58:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13584272#comment-13584272
] 

Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4485:
-----------------------------------

I agree with the idea, but why shove it into queryparser?
queryparsers are already a god object in solr and responsible for way too much.

Instead, make throwing the exception the 'else' case in XXX.getField/Range/etcQuery, 
which queryparsers call, so it doesnt have to be part of every parser. 

Its already way too hard to make a custom queryparser. Exhibit A is the totally broken TextField.getFieldQuery!
                
> Consider making QParsers throw SyntaxError if field being searched is not indexed
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4485
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4485
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Assignee: Hoss Man
>
> For historical reasons that i can't even really remember right now most query parsing
in solr don't seem to care if the fields they are asked to search are indexed.  Using hte
4x example schema (where the content field is stored but not indexed), all of these queries
return a 200 status code, and match 0 documents...
> {noformat}
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?defType=lucene&q=ignored_xx:foo
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?qf=ignored_xx&defType=edismax&q=foo
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?qf=ignored_xx&defType=dismax&q=foo
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q={!field%20f=ignored_xx}foo
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q={!term%20f=ignored_xx}foo
> {noformat}
> I'm opening this issue to gather feedback on whether people think we should treat this
as a bug that should be fixed, or if folks think it's better to leave things as they stand.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message