lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4485) Consider making QParsers throw SyntaxError if field being searched is not indexed
Date Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:22:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13583901#comment-13583901
] 

Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4485:
-----------------------------------

-1

This is at odds with the concept of docvalues fields.

whether a field is indexed "inverted" or "forward" is a user decision. 

But we can certainly now search unindexed fields: e.g. SOLR-4477

otherwise I'm happy to revert SOLR-4477. Seriously. I just think its the right way to go.
but we need to be consistent.
                
> Consider making QParsers throw SyntaxError if field being searched is not indexed
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4485
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4485
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Assignee: Hoss Man
>
> For historical reasons that i can't even really remember right now most query parsing
in solr don't seem to care if the fields they are asked to search are indexed.  Using hte
4x example schema (where the content field is stored but not indexed), all of these queries
return a 200 status code, and match 0 documents...
> {noformat}
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?defType=lucene&q=ignored_xx:foo
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?qf=ignored_xx&defType=edismax&q=foo
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?qf=ignored_xx&defType=dismax&q=foo
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q={!field%20f=ignored_xx}foo
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q={!term%20f=ignored_xx}foo
> {noformat}
> I'm opening this issue to gather feedback on whether people think we should treat this
as a bug that should be fixed, or if folks think it's better to leave things as they stand.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message