lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (SOLR-4485) Consider making QParsers throw SyntaxError if field being searched is not indexed
Date Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:48:14 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Hoss Man updated SOLR-4485:
---------------------------

    Description: 
For historical reasons that i can't even really remember right now most query parsing in solr
don't seem to care if the fields they are asked to search are indexed.  Using hte 4x example
schema (where the content field is stored but not indexed), all of these queries return a
200 status code, and match 0 documents...

{noformat}
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?defType=lucene&q=ignored_xx:foo
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?qf=ignored_xx&defType=edismax&q=foo
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?qf=ignored_xx&defType=dismax&q=foo
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q={!field%20f=ignored_xx}foo
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q={!term%20f=ignored_xx}foo
{noformat}

I'm opening this issue to gather feedback on whether people think we should treat this as
a bug that should be fixed, or if folks think it's better to leave things as they stand.


  was:
For historical reasons that i can't even really remember right now most query parsing in solr
don't seem to care if the fields they are asked to search are indexed.  Using hte 4x example
schema (where the content field is stored but not indexed), all of these queries return a
200 status code, and match 0 documents...

http://localhost:8983/solr/select?defType=lucene&q=ignored_xx:foo
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?qf=ignored_xx&defType=edismax&q=foo
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?qf=ignored_xx&defType=dismax&q=foo
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q={!field%20f=ignored_xx}foo
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q={!term%20f=ignored_xx}foo

I'm opening this issue to gather feedback on whether people think we should treat this as
a bug that should be fixed, or if folks think it's better to leave things as they stand.


    
> Consider making QParsers throw SyntaxError if field being searched is not indexed
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4485
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4485
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>
> For historical reasons that i can't even really remember right now most query parsing
in solr don't seem to care if the fields they are asked to search are indexed.  Using hte
4x example schema (where the content field is stored but not indexed), all of these queries
return a 200 status code, and match 0 documents...
> {noformat}
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?defType=lucene&q=ignored_xx:foo
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?qf=ignored_xx&defType=edismax&q=foo
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?qf=ignored_xx&defType=dismax&q=foo
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q={!field%20f=ignored_xx}foo
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q={!term%20f=ignored_xx}foo
> {noformat}
> I'm opening this issue to gather feedback on whether people think we should treat this
as a bug that should be fixed, or if folks think it's better to leave things as they stand.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message