Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67390DCF3 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17783 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2012 21:09:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 17620 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2012 21:09:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 17613 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2012 21:09:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:09:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of karl.wright@nokia.com designates 147.243.128.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [147.243.128.26] (HELO mgw-da02.nokia.com) (147.243.128.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:09:48 +0000 Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com (in-mx.nokia.com [10.160.244.30]) by mgw-da02.nokia.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qAFL9PA1023480 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:09:27 +0200 Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.49]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:09:24 +0200 Received: from 008-AM1MPN2-083.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.3.100]) by 008-AM1MMR2-015.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.49]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.003; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:09:24 +0000 From: To: Subject: RE: Spatial4j dependency in lucene 4.0.0, final Thread-Topic: Spatial4j dependency in lucene 4.0.0, final Thread-Index: Ac3DRUDs7oKJ49eWSv+OSJeZNxBxMAAWZLqAAApw4/A= Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:09:23 +0000 Message-ID: <0BA6D34688263E4F8E6152478F7C336C176F6AA0@008-AM1MPN2-083.mgdnok.nokia.com> References: <0BA6D34688263E4F8E6152478F7C336C176F6697@008-AM1MPN2-083.mgdnok.nokia.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-version: 3.3.8.1 x-tituslabs-classifications-30: TLPropertyRoot=Nokia;Confidentiality=Nokia Internal Use Only;Project=None; x-headerinfofordlp: None x-tituslabs-classificationhash-30: VgNFIFU9Hx+/nZJb9Kg7Ijiz37TGlo4GcpSU9tEbTjBBOSScrdJ/G+iY6uZiCry/hMATrze/keNJcA/XUphyTobeSiKwCDg+lfD0JkDkS++EIAKMApslc3+eJNlsFH7/FB5n8C/m2zlLOYuG50SQpxJhpIdmFauZU6+G5UKflNTvju92Sp5BbgUm3UPKexxpozlcVC+NZX53fJfvWPOPUiFx3tGH19Gli0FZ6R//yBMQ4EshFz6X7xid6eufgeFn x-originating-ip: [172.18.51.225] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0BA6D34688263E4F8E6152478F7C336C176F6AA0008AM1MPN2083mg_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Nov 2012 21:09:24.0856 (UTC) FILETIME=[7D8C7780:01CDC375] X-Nokia-AV: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_0BA6D34688263E4F8E6152478F7C336C176F6AA0008AM1MPN2083mg_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi David, We found the version in the grandparent pom, so that's ok. The build issue= against 0.2 was due to other changes in Lucene 4.0.0-BETA vs. Lucene 4.0.0= . I am willing to assist to some extent with spatial4j, if that is yours. It= changed significantly from 0.2 to 0.3, and not just in the area of package= and class naming, no? Karl From: ext Smiley, David W. [mailto:dsmiley@mitre.org] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 4:05 PM To: Subject: Re: Spatial4j dependency in lucene 4.0.0, final Hi Karl! You say that the dependency isn't versioned, but all dependencies are versi= oned. If you say it's unversioned because you can't see the version in the= pom for lucene-spatial, that's because it's specified in the section of the parent pom for lucene itself. Lucene 4.0.0-BETA d= epends on Spatial4j 0.2, and Lucene 4.0.0 depends on Spatial4j 0.3. I'm no= t sure what to say about your code that won't compile with either. By the way, if you would like to participate in shaping Spatial4j and/or Lu= cene spatial, then I welcome your input; I know you have some spatial exper= ience with MetaCarta. Presently, it's basically just me + a little bit of = Chris Male; Ryan McKinley has 0 bandwidth these days. Cheers, David On Nov 15, 2012, at 10:27 AM, > > wrote: Hi guys, The 4.0.0 lucene-spatial maven dependency on spatial4j is UNVERSIONED. But= the two spatial4j versions in play (0.2 and 0.3) are significantly differe= nt. We have code developed for lucene-spatial 4.0.0 beta which doesn't see= m to compile with either spatial4j version. What was the intention here? Karl --_000_0BA6D34688263E4F8E6152478F7C336C176F6AA0008AM1MPN2083mg_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi David,

 <= /p>

We found the version in t= he grandparent pom, so that’s ok.  The build issue against 0.2 w= as due to other changes in Lucene 4.0.0-BETA vs. Lucene 4.0.0.

 <= /p>

I am willing to assist to= some extent with spatial4j, if that is yours.  It changed significant= ly from 0.2 to 0.3, and not just in the area of package and class naming, no?

 <= /p>

Karl

 <= /p>

From: ext Smil= ey, David W. [mailto:dsmiley@mitre.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 4:05 PM
To: <dev@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Spatial4j dependency in lucene 4.0.0, final<= /span>

 

Hi Karl!

 

You say that the dependency isn't versioned, but all= dependencies are versioned.  If you say it's unversioned because you = can't see the version in the pom for lucene-spatial, that's because it's sp= ecified in the <dependencyManagement> section of the parent pom for lucene itself.  Lucene 4.0.0-BETA depends on Sp= atial4j 0.2, and Lucene 4.0.0 depends on Spatial4j 0.3.  I'm not sure = what to say about your code that won't compile with either.

 

By the way, if you would like to participate in shap= ing Spatial4j and/or Lucene spatial, then I welcome your input; I know you = have some spatial experience with MetaCarta.  Presently, it's basicall= y just me + a little bit of Chris Male; Ryan McKinley has 0 bandwidth these days.

 

Cheers,

David

 

On Nov 15, 2012, at 10:27 AM, <karl.wright@nokia.com>



Hi guys,

 

The 4.0.0 lucene-spatial maven dependen= cy on spatial4j is UNVERSIONED.  But the two spatial4j versions in pla= y (0.2 and 0.3) are significantly different.  We have code developed for lucene-spatial 4.0.0 beta which doesn’t seem to compile with eit= her spatial4j version.  What was the intention here?=

 

Karl

 

 

--_000_0BA6D34688263E4F8E6152478F7C336C176F6AA0008AM1MPN2083mg_--