lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shai Erera <>
Subject Re: Facet examples javadoc missing in 4.0?
Date Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:18:56 GMT
Uwe, it's a good question :). The javadocs aren't that rich, and the
lucene-facet-examples.jar is created with the source code anyway ...

Robert, I don't know maven enough but I do see this in


Does it mean that it's ok?

Per Uwe's (enlightening) question, I'm willing to let go of this for now.


On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Robert Muir <> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Shai Erera <> wrote:
>> I don't hack anything, just return things to how they were. If we make
>> the separation successfully in time for 4.1, then we can change the
>> build.xml back. Otherwise, at least the examples javadocs will be out there.
>> Since it worked before, I don't think that there will be any issues with
>> maven, unless it didn't work correctly before.
> I don't really understand this. Again I reiterate: we really shouldn't do
> this hack.
> I want to know whats in our artifacts: e.g. if facet module contains "A+B"
> on but only "A" on maven and so on, this is really
> confusing and messy.
> I dont think faceting needs any special case here. We just need to clean
> up the mess.

View raw message