lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Simon Willnauer (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4547) DocValues field broken on large indexes
Date Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:20:59 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13500213#comment-13500213
] 

Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-4547:
-----------------------------------------

bq. Its really broken that things like grouping and faceting are coded to a separate API.
This makes DV unsuccessful. 

don't get me wrong I think this adds a lot of value. BUT, if the only way to get a DV instance
that is cached is FC then this entire thing is inconsistent. We don't ask people to cache
TermEnum which can be heavy if you use MemoryPostings for instance. We neither do for StoredFields
nor do we have a caching layer that is not used by default. All I am arguing for is that if
somebody wants to use DV it should be simple to do so. The distinction between in-memory and
on disk should not be in FC.

bq.  If we arent going to fix DocValues and Faceting APIs then perhaps we shoudl consider
removing DocValues completely from lucene.

you mean remove fieldcache?
                
> DocValues field broken on large indexes
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4547
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4547
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.1
>
>         Attachments: test.patch
>
>
> I tried to write a test to sanity check LUCENE-4536 (first running against svn revision
1406416, before the change).
> But i found docvalues is already broken here for large indexes that have a PackedLongDocValues
field:
> {code}
> final int numDocs = 500000000;
> for (int i = 0; i < numDocs; ++i) {
>   if (i == 0) {
>     field.setLongValue(0L); // force > 32bit deltas
>   } else {
>     field.setLongValue(1<<33L); 
>   }
>   w.addDocument(doc);
> }
> w.forceMerge(1);
> w.close();
> dir.close(); // checkindex
> {code}
> {noformat}
> [junit4:junit4]   2> WARNING: Uncaught exception in thread: Thread[Lucene Merge Thread
#0,6,TGRP-Test2GBDocValues]
> [junit4:junit4]   2> org.apache.lucene.index.MergePolicy$MergeException: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException:
-65536
> [junit4:junit4]   2> 	at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([5DC54DB14FA5979]:0)
> [junit4:junit4]   2> 	at org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler.handleMergeException(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:535)
> [junit4:junit4]   2> 	at org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler$MergeThread.run(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:508)
> [junit4:junit4]   2> Caused by: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -65536
> [junit4:junit4]   2> 	at org.apache.lucene.util.ByteBlockPool.deref(ByteBlockPool.java:305)
> [junit4:junit4]   2> 	at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.values.FixedStraightBytesImpl$FixedBytesWriterBase.set(FixedStraightBytesImpl.java:115)
> [junit4:junit4]   2> 	at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.values.PackedIntValues$PackedIntsWriter.writePackedInts(PackedIntValues.java:109)
> [junit4:junit4]   2> 	at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.values.PackedIntValues$PackedIntsWriter.finish(PackedIntValues.java:80)
> [junit4:junit4]   2> 	at org.apache.lucene.codecs.DocValuesConsumer.merge(DocValuesConsumer.java:130)
> [junit4:junit4]   2> 	at org.apache.lucene.codecs.PerDocConsumer.merge(PerDocConsumer.java:65)
> {noformat}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message