lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <...@thetaphi.de>
Subject RE: svn commit: r1393408 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene: ./ codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/simpletext/ core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/ core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/codecs/perfield/ core/src/te
Date Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:33:11 GMT
Then we should nuke it. The commits are not lost, you can always look at them after deletion.
Just open your repository browser and enter an older revision number! I just don’t want
to make the "play-around" branches be first-class citicens of the Lucene / Solr repository.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 6:14 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1393408 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene: ./
> codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/simpletext/
> core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/
> core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/
> core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/codecs/perfield/ core/src/te
> 
> I created a patch because the branch had lots of back-and-forth (essentially
> noise) from mike and I.
> 
> We also dont move anything around or anyting like that (its just fixing
> bugs/tests really) so a patch to me made more sense...
> 
> The branch was just so we could easily collaborate and set my jenkins on it, etc,
> etc.
> 
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> > Why did you not merge-reintegrate?
> >
> > -----
> > Uwe Schindler
> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> > http://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 6:04 PM
> >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1393408 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene: ./
> >> codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/simpletext/
> >> core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/
> >> core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/
> >> core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/codecs/perfield/ core/src/te
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> >> > Yes :)
> >> > It is still there and can be viewed (using @rev in URL), but it
> >> > should not be
> >> visible as "active". We already have way too many branches, which
> >> seem to be dead, we should cleanup.
> >>
> >> Hmm, though, I'm nervous destroying commit history ... I don't think
> >> in this case it'd be useful ... but maybe it could be?
> >>
> >> I don't think we have THAT many branches :)
> >>
> >> Mike McCandless
> >>
> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
> >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message