Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D02BD2D3 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 01:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62001 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2012 01:54:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 61909 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2012 01:54:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 61902 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2012 01:54:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 01:54:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vb0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 01:54:19 +0000 Received: by vbme21 with SMTP id e21so6503622vbm.35 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:53:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=BJBIPtTyxfsI0oVcv1PNeTn6qLLkkoewk9hCkA/hGrU=; b=hYmhQPtB16qRzikHd4P1YXvRBIdvHmplTBpgb/0z16Dum2+wkpnZfvkP1vzIQQZBg9 VwVIxwoRzTW7PRL9eVwMTD1ezUHrSkG+NLimXuIMTSQVclJ45E3YorIHBqVjLIjkCyeV QlHF11hPod+zHQHmURe+Vim8o0clWGlrXKkXdghTS6qaIFEIhJUVf0+4/LUGz+mFPdg2 Httef6eOJnopsj97oCeI0qgya37uuAQTPRNPMHxsBeZmoznJFjlAoo7CteLVktahrCAX Jvik9BnIShzxr0bNOQvsLOWeMKC0MM2q68GvEglTutcZ0bsSAaSVjAX2dOxsZbDStbq0 qxsg== Received: by 10.59.1.162 with SMTP id bh2mr7014939ved.13.1347846838711; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:53:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.239.14 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:53:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <00e801cd9422$3553b690$9ffb23b0$@thetaphi.de> <6C78E97C707B5B4C8CC61D44F87545863BD6A3@SUEX10-mbx-03.ad.syr.edu> From: Robert Muir Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 21:53:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: being a good citizen is hard when you can't successfully run tests.... To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Robert Muir wrote: >> not so much energy spent fixing these few shitty solr tests, some of >> which (Like TestReplicationHandler) are totally useless and have been >> failing sporatically for like, years. > > Can you explain why it's useless (without the derogatory adjectives please)? it fails multiple times a day, that makes it useless. its like the boy that cried wolf, nobody is even taking the time to look at it. its unmaintained, dead code. > - Many of us (including you) *have* worked to improve the situation > over time when it does deteriorate - check the logs. i worked on it a while ago because it was failing every day and nobody else was interested in fixing it. > > It's not clear what you are suggesting (unless you are volunteering to > look into this issue with OS-X apparently, or volunteering to write a > new replication test from scratch or something). I'm volunteering to disable this test: I put my time into it already, I dont care about replication, I just want the test to stop failing every day. -- lucidworks.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org