Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8832BD3B5 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19062 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2012 22:00:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 19014 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2012 22:00:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 19007 invoked by uid 99); 24 Sep 2012 22:00:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:00:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FSL_FREEMAIL_1,FSL_FREEMAIL_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qc0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:00:11 +0000 Received: by qcon41 with SMTP id n41so2862991qco.35 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:59:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=O1enYVxkjfqdQe5gQHeOQE8bT3Br0KPa8/4UauM+F2A=; b=qfst4S58+r46EfSttSlFIB57evs68EK7CJP/x1BGG45NNfqzRrdfaJUeijMXQ9RVeV jOMNVhIbmYTEUdSYADz1rgxzDRYm+3WbyQXSZ0b3HyEGGkEy1zDWJCHRx/vy6vAaAMfO UOEH7bztj1bT5YBGlZ1bzKt24Pryr5OJChP4myFcaJZAKa3BYF2vyP4TrVb/pZePrYlj 6JRDKBmMxlYGdgsY9IhFKp8G623qwGKhb4WeK7kWClWET/aYVvBiIQiOXxNPaSqUTfKr N9TgqyJY37YyLuKP8WOgdiHxvEcOkKpoEFAI+Hl+AIiKJ/DLPwedHwAgssUXukFW7Hld fQYg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.209.8 with SMTP id ge8mr35538328qab.0.1348523990708; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.206.34 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: markrmiller@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <005501cd9a9f$b682b7b0$23882710$@thetaphi.de> References: <1348497188.2951.514.camel@te-prime> <1348512956722-4009941.post@n3.nabble.com> <005501cd9a9f$b682b7b0$23882710$@thetaphi.de> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:59:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: VOTE: release 4.0 From: Mark Miller To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'm voting for the respin as well. We should wait a brief time to let any other issues surface I think though. On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > +1, If we do this, I would be happy to also fix the servlet-api.jar issue. If you want to add ecj-linter, I would also be happy, but that's not important, just nice to have! > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: yseeley@gmail.com [mailto:yseeley@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik >> Seeley >> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 11:39 PM >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: VOTE: release 4.0 >> >> Folks, it looks like there definitely should be a respin, so please remember to >> back-port fixes that should go into 4.0 to the >> 4.0 branch in addition to the 4x branch. >> >> -Yonik >> http://lucidworks.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional >> commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org > -- - Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org