Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCCA4DBA7 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29607 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2012 15:41:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 29519 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2012 15:41:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 29445 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2012 15:41:08 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:41:08 +0000 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:41:07 +1100 (NCT) From: "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <460429538.69723.1347464468027.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas> In-Reply-To: <137508054.69635.1347462427833.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3830) Rename LFUCache to FastLFUCache MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13454067#comment-13454067 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3830: ------------------------------------ bq. so I'd like to rename it to FastLFUCache. +1, it hasn't been used in the default solrconfig.xml, so this change shouldn't really affect anyone. I don't think we should rename the other ones that people are likely to have in their configs already though. There is a note right next to where one would configure these cases that tries to explain the difference. We should update that if it's not sufficient. > Rename LFUCache to FastLFUCache > ------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-3830 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3830 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 4.0-BETA > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Priority: Minor > > I find it a little disturbing that LFUCache shares most of its behavior (not strictly bounded size, good at concurrent reads, slow at writes unless eviction is performed in a separate thread) with FastLRUCache while it sounds like it is the LFU equivalent of LRUCache (strictly bounded size, synchronized reads, fast writes) so I'd like to rename it to FastLFUCache. > Maybe we should also rename these Fast*Cache to Concurrent*Cache so that people don't think that they are better than their non Fast alternatives in every way. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org