Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of uwe@thetaphi.de designates
 188.138.97.18 as permitted sender)
From: "Uwe Schindler" <uwe@thetaphi.de>
To: <dev@lucene.apache.org>
References: <F36DD687969C423E97F14DF12ABEE3E5@JackKrupansky>
 <01d201cd973f$98f6d720$cae48560$@thetaphi.de>
 <6D958090CE0A4542A68C3F19EDE160B9@JackKrupansky>
 <CAOdYfZU_5Cn7u_ui1nAPNvz5Z-oywwUr1-yjO-PnBSbgEi3bkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <0E416B4C8B854BB8ADD8975E17746BD2@JackKrupansky>
In-Reply-To: <0E416B4C8B854BB8ADD8975E17746BD2@JackKrupansky>
Subject: RE: Is it safe to upgrade to Oracle Java 7u7 for Lucene/Solr
 development and use?
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:33:05 +0200
Message-ID: <01fd01cd974d$9c95c770$d5c15650$@thetaphi.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQGXrojgS4lseeMXgRWadMBstsROXgMZi7ScAigypX4BiE5JggEZjATql8AhDZA=
Content-Language: de

No Oracle fixed the problem in 7u1, see =
http://blog.thetaphi.de/2011/10/java-7-update-1-released-does-it-fix.html=

If you use Java 7 GA then your index is corru(m)pt in milliseconds :-)

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:jack@basetechnology.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 6:26 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is it safe to upgrade to Oracle Java 7u7 for Lucene/Solr
> development and use?
>=20
> Thanks, but I was under the impression that there was a release of 1.7 =
that did
> not work properly with Lucene. Or, was there a workaround in a =
subsequent
> release of Lucene so that Lucene/Solr (3.6, 3.6.1, 4.0, 5.0) now works =
with even
> that early Java 7 release that failed with earlier releases of =
Lucene/Solr?
>=20
>=20
> -- Jack Krupansky
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Muir
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:45 AM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is it safe to upgrade to Oracle Java 7u7 for Lucene/Solr
> development and use?
>=20
> BUILD.txt:
>=20
> Lucene Build Instructions
>=20
> Basic steps:
>   0) Install JDK 1.6 (or greater)
>=20
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Jack Krupansky
> <jack@basetechnology.com> wrote:
> > Okay, that was the one place I hadn=E2=80=99t looked. Thanks. Still, =
it seems
> > to me that a release should clearly state what it requires, and =
there
> > is no mention in the 4.0 text files what Java versions are =
supported,
> > other than the ambiguous references I mentioned. I mean, if someone =
is
> > starting out with 4.0, why should they have to read the release =
notes
> > for 3.6??
> >
> > -- Jack Krupansky
> >
> > From: Uwe Schindler
> > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 10:52 AM
> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Is it safe to upgrade to Oracle Java 7u7 for =
Lucene/Solr
> > development and use?
> >
> >
> > We already stated that in Lucene 3.5/3.6 release note! It=E2=80=99s =
fine since
> > Java 7u1. There are no news in Lucene 4.0
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> >
> > Uwe Schindler
> >
> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> >
> > http://www.thetaphi.de
> >
> > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:jack@basetechnology.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 4:49 PM
> > To: Lucene/Solr Dev
> > Subject: Is it safe to upgrade to Oracle Java 7u7 for Lucene/Solr
> > development and use?
> >
> >
> >
> > The Oracle Java Update tool on my Windows PC is pretty insistent =
that it
> > wants to update my machine to Java 7u7 and REMOVE Java 6. Is it safe =
to
> > use
> > Java 7u7 for both Lucene Solr development and running Solr yet? My
> > presumption has been that Lucene/Solr still =
=E2=80=9Crequires=E2=80=9D Java 6.
> >
> >
> >
> > The 4.0 Solr README.txt says to use the Java 6 JDK, but then adds =
=E2=80=9Cverify
> >
> > that the Java version is 1.6 or later =E2=80=9D, implying that a =
later release
> > would
> > be okay. Given that Java 7 will be the =E2=80=9Ccurrent=E2=80=9D =
release, the README
> > should
> > make some specific statement regarding Java 7.
> >
> >
> >
> > And maybe the top-level README.txt should have a Java version =
statement =E2=80=93
> > unless both 7 and 6 are fine =E2=80=93 although there is a minimum =
update level
> > that
> > works for 7 and Lucene, right? In any case, clear guidance should be
> > provided.
> >
> >
> >
> > The Solr 4.0 CHANGES.txt does say =E2=80=9CYou
> >
> > need a Java 1.6 VM or later installed=E2=80=9D, suggesting that Java =
7 is fine. No
> > mention of Java version requirement in the Lucene CHANGES.txt.
> >
> >
> >
> > I may just manually install 7u7 and not use it to avoid the update =
notice
> > until Lucene/Solr =E2=80=9Cupgrades=E2=80=9D to Java 7, but I =
suspect a fair number of
> > people will simply take the update and say goodbye to Java 6.
> >
> >
> > -- Jack Krupansky
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --
> lucidworks.com
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>=20
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org