lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Hostetter <>
Subject Re: FuzzyQuery vs SlowFuzsyQuery docs? -- was: Re: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2667) Fix FuzzyQuery's defaults, so its fast.
Date Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:12:20 GMT

: > Is there any reason why SlowFuzzyQuery shouldn't be in the class level
: > javadocs for FuzzyQuery ?
: >
: I already answered this today: I'm strongly against having this
: unscalable garbage in lucene's core.

That doesn't answe my question about mentioning SlowFuzzyQuery in the 
javadocs for FuzzyQuery -- if it's unscablae and you dont' want the 
*class* in lucene's core then fine, but for users who upgrade and used 
FuzzyQuery with a distance greater then  2 in the past, shouldn't we 
mention "You should go use SlowFuzzyQuery for your crazy unscalableness"

For that matter: shouldn't something about FuzzyQuery->SlowFuzzyQuery for 
d > 2 be in MIGRATE.txt?


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message