lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Høydahl <>
Subject Re: Spatial field names in Solr
Date Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:17:00 GMT
The class names can be long and descriptive, but the field-type "location_rpt" is short and

Should we also add a <dynamicField name="*_geo" type="location_rpt" multiValued="true"
> to make it possible to use it with an unmodified schema?
Should we deprecate the "old" LatLonType in code and docs or would you say that both are needed
due to features/performance?
If we want people to use the new spatial over the old, the exampledocs should also index&query
store locations using the new field

Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS -
Solr Training -

19. sep. 2012 kl. 04:02 skrev David Smiley ( <>:

> Hi Jack,
> Thanks for your interest. Each SpatialStrategy has its pros and cons.  I'm
> working through creating slides for a conference today in fact: 
>   Now that the
> Solr adapters are committed, I'll be focusing more on documentation.  That
> means the wiki, and javadoc comments on the SpatialStrategy impls to
> indicate how each works.
> ~ David
> -----
> Author:
> --
> View this message in context:
> Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message