lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidworks.com>
Subject Re: FuzzyQuery vs SlowFuzsyQuery docs? -- was: Re: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2667) Fix FuzzyQuery's defaults, so its fast.
Date Fri, 14 Sep 2012 02:31:25 GMT
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Jack Krupansky <jack@basetechnology.com> wrote:
> I would argue that
> SlowFuzzyQuery should be un-deprecated and moved from sandbox back into
> Lucene proper since it does have value in SOME cases. Actually, I would
> argue that it should be recombined with "fast" FuzzyQuery (joined at the hip
> as it were) and simply document that if you use a max edit distance > 2 then
> it will be "slow".

+1
Sounds reasonable to me.

-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message