lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris Male (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4412) Reconsider FunctionValues / ValueSource API
Date Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:08:14 GMT


Chris Male commented on LUCENE-4412:

Thanks for raising those concerns David.  They're exactly what I'm referring to and what concern
me greatly.  If you have any thoughts on how we can better design this API (and lets not be
bound by what the current API looks like) please put them in this issue.
> Reconsider FunctionValues / ValueSource API
> -------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-4412
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/other
>            Reporter: Chris Male
>             Fix For: 5.0
> When documenting a lot of these classes today I found myself confused and it isn't the
first time with this API.  
> I think we need to step back and reassess what we want from this API, what use cases
its designed to meet, and redesign it from the ground up.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message