lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adrien Grand (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4322) Can we make oal.util.packed.BulkOperation* smaller?
Date Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:16:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13443284#comment-13443284
] 

Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-4322:
--------------------------------------

bq. We could still shrink things further by doing less loop unrolling ourselves? Eg for BulkOperationPacked2,
when decoding from byte[], that code is replicated 8 times but could be done as just 8* iters.

Yes, I had planned to work on it too! Unless someone doesn't like my last patch, I'll commit
it and will start working on this loop unrolling issue soon...

                
> Can we make oal.util.packed.BulkOperation* smaller?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4322
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4322
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 5.0, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4322.patch
>
>
> These source files add up to a lot of sources ... it caused problems when compiling under
Maven and InteliJ.
> I committed a change to make separates files, but in aggregate this is still a lot ...
> EG maybe we don't need to specialize encode?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message