lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dawid Weiss (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4322) Can we make oal.util.packed.BulkOperation* smaller?
Date Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:51:42 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13440179#comment-13440179
] 

Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4322:
-------------------------------------

I looked into those files briefly so this may not be applicable but if possible make them
use loops instead of manually unrolling the code in Java. JIT will typically unroll loops
anyway depending on the environment and those unrolled JIT loops are faster than java-unrolled
loops (because certain bounds checks can be eliminated).
                
> Can we make oal.util.packed.BulkOperation* smaller?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4322
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4322
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 5.0, 4.0
>
>
> These source files add up to a lot of sources ... it caused problems when compiling under
Maven and InteliJ.
> I committed a change to make separates files, but in aggregate this is still a lot ...
> EG maybe we don't need to specialize encode?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message