lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dawid Weiss (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4322) Can we make oal.util.packed.BulkOperation* smaller?
Date Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:36:42 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13440282#comment-13440282
] 

Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4322:
-------------------------------------

It shouldn't make anything slower, really. There are several reasons -- loop unrolling at
jit time is one, but then there are also jit codegen limits (too big methods won't even jit,
ever), cpu cache considerations (jitted code will be larger than a loop), etc.
                
> Can we make oal.util.packed.BulkOperation* smaller?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4322
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4322
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 5.0, 4.0
>
>
> These source files add up to a lot of sources ... it caused problems when compiling under
Maven and InteliJ.
> I committed a change to make separates files, but in aggregate this is still a lot ...
> EG maybe we don't need to specialize encode?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message