Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5C0F9EAC for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77665 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2012 10:47:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 77483 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2012 10:47:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 77460 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2012 10:47:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:47:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vb0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:47:40 +0000 Received: by vbjk17 with SMTP id k17so2750792vbj.35 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 03:47:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=4vNy8CwyGZ/wLlyqtHOWA0fVqargK4IyQxjF8+BWRHM=; b=mGpbIri+B9Wk5eKGcPTIr5AQOD/3PMGwHNLzxXB2k34WLV9ZS0TANjC7kOsrRrku0O wA4o9oo6+pRhOohEtx82jgv3aKwZzy2nzzToC7ZKuyKmp584DKpfwqrlWaFWtb+ATpTE 78Z8h1arD2HdzvdX1JADR/Op7jHBUnJWG0YPXilTdEXK0smjZKyMF38b5SHiRMKmQbH9 LtT2jNOQ7EPBkhXWpcSYz0J1GpdPhX/x7g1SuD0APWrPGojrk5+ie87U5lcrtvkxAYVF NX5XWldlVClGyfNQFr9SAMaOKtm1WNquybSmQ9/xkHPZmmQGAHkgtEyaNnSMb2D9TfKJ yWAg== Received: by 10.220.148.196 with SMTP id q4mr687747vcv.36.1340966839014; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 03:47:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.91.11 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 03:46:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Robert Muir Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:46:58 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Use of @Slow annotation on tests To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote: >>> is annotated with this annotation. I don't know how slow it really is, >> >> couple of hours :) > > We need @SuperSlow. Or @YouWillTurnToDustBeforeItCompletes. > >> +1! Of course from time to time we should try to fix these slow tests > > Yep, it is unavoidable that the time will be increasing but we have > the tools to collect stats periodically and we definitely should both > try to decrease the time for the slowest tests and try to make life > easier for developers by marking the slowest ones @Nightly and @Slow. > I consider @Nightly stronger than @Slow because they're turned off by > default. @Slow would be optional -- those who want a quick run can > override it, those who don't care can run the full suite. > > I filed this issue: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4181 > > I'm measuring the speed difference for the same seed out of curiosity, > will apply shortly. > I like the idea: maybe Test2BTerms should be @Weekly? I know we don't use this (yet) in jenkins but the mechanism is there if someone wants it right? -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org