Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B73B19313 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 00:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90860 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2012 00:06:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 90801 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2012 00:06:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 90793 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2012 00:06:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:06:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vb0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:06:32 +0000 Received: by vbjk17 with SMTP id k17so1294071vbj.35 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 17:06:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=3xyS/HWw5xXut81myI+3WLxvcW9zdl4uNDmH3oZrtdY=; b=LCtLaxRiWqjgLsckobU7zZMdjA7E2o6Xau+wis06TximjCNoJ5auoM+4uKk1lUeBdp v4XKLF1Al8tmekuv0QptcCueC00yJ6O/3urTbyWG4uzlIEbl76W9N5uwEc2xE/JSUZFn e2nD62ldD0/l8HuXeTl9uUVVJikUsxEI0OyH7h8zxWFxUnWtcTjY7cu8U5pu9G0fUhl7 d445r+IU33ZcMpTZidrCQ03w2qXGSikTNulTj5fsY2+mSyJl8OfyS328e1ENXOucwNsO yscMdUb5p9+laogv3ew7xnM0jY3Q16exI5s+UffEFu5S0PsS2Sus3gtldLvaMgrcLNdV yobA== Received: by 10.220.219.75 with SMTP id ht11mr434287vcb.3.1338509171830; Thu, 31 May 2012 17:06:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.105.132 with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2012 17:05:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <930959354.1153.1338490483270.JavaMail.hudson@aegis.apache.org> From: Robert Muir Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:05:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 2723 - Failure To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > I think the best option is to ignore the OOME from this test case...? > > Mike McCandless > I think thats fine for now, but I'm not convinced there is no problem at all. However, its not obvious the problem is us, either. Its easy to see this OOM is related to G1 garbage collector. This test has failed 3 times in the past couple days (before it never failed: i suspect packed ints changes sent it over the edge). https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2707/ https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2719/ https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2723/ All 3 cases are java 7, and all 3 cases uses -XX:+UseG1GC. (Uwe turned on GC randomization at lucene revolution) -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org