Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4FD02570.7060309@elyograg.org>
References: <4FD02570.7060309@elyograg.org>
From: Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 08:28:56 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAOdYfZUKGV44HSOF1nbBwTykAabFofgxfORENnsKtK8XtXw2cA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How much Lucene 4.0 capability is NOT in Solr 4.0?
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Shawn Heisey <solr@elyograg.org> wrote:
> I was perusing email from this list and came across LUCENE-4069. =C2=A0If=
 it is
> as good as it says, it looks like a fit for a couple of the fields in my
> index.
>
> I will admit that I don't entirely understand all of what's being said
> regarding codecs, postings, and other such terms, but because I run a
> distributed Solr index, I do understand that not all of Lucene's
> functionality is available in Solr. =C2=A0My question: How much of all th=
e new
> bells and whistles in 4.0 will be available in Solr without custom coding=
?
> =C2=A0In this specific instance, I would like to be able to use LUCENE-40=
69, but
> my question is more general than that -- will it be possible to take the
> official Solr 4.0 (or 4.1, or 4.2) download and specify codecs and other
> details on a per-field basis?
>

Maybe you are confused... you can already do this (for over a year).
See the tests.

Keep in mind that customizing the index format in this way is expert,
e.g. we don't provide index backwards compatibility for it across
releases, etc etc.

--=20
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org