Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98F6D986E for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56788 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2012 10:36:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 56301 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2012 10:36:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 56256 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2012 10:36:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:36:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-we0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:36:50 +0000 Received: by weyr3 with SMTP id r3so1641520wey.35 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:36:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Hg9bqJlamkF6oz3nnavv+SVPMW35LzMNo05+gswds38=; b=V+SacCeQJsziVJy0vgfS8jWIS5Sk7+81dqKtap9AHDQcz1MilmatRrDpnq9MlgQY6/ Hnw70RzYyzBfKk+rhXuvkQdZ+XAdaroe94yK+iylxw39AAN04B4RlJg/CFY+6cpLyXxO rx09MFaDTDxxhwGdu5yZdUWN6LtjBgaAeU+oYJgklZo2xmlZKcwVc1dVw1E4E6Xv2egD z+OmKGPdPnxurg622uvVN1foHHL/asTp4oPyqee4UOmlEFtcmmFTiFLhdyHbZU2gaBLQ X0/DikoPXr8TPOVjxGtq2ocEf9IUrEuN/MbkUOBIe+RvjwSyAFh6LC9egGE71l/bJ8K3 NraQ== Received: by 10.216.131.150 with SMTP id m22mr1731877wei.111.1338546986364; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:36:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.39.9 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 03:35:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <930959354.1153.1338490483270.JavaMail.hudson@aegis.apache.org> From: Michael McCandless Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 06:35:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 2723 - Failure To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQltkxb05/AScsdijo0F+nfJdmdVboE20Y8CyKPMpqTcsrUoHQrEmoxJa7l3YiCX2LysJcTU On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Michael McCandless > wrote: >> I think the best option is to ignore the OOME from this test case...? >> >> Mike McCandless >> > > I think thats fine for now, but I'm not convinced there is no problem > at all. However, its not obvious the problem is us, either. > > Its easy to see this OOM is related to G1 garbage collector. > > This test has failed 3 times in the past couple days (before it never > failed: i suspect packed ints changes sent it over the edge). > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2707/ > https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2719/ > https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2723/ > > All 3 cases are java 7, and all 3 cases uses -XX:+UseG1GC. (Uwe turned > on GC randomization at lucene revolution) Aha! Nice sleuthing :) So maybe this means G1 isn't as good when heap is limited... Can we somehow detect / pass property to the JVM when G1 is in use? Then we can scope down the "ignore OOME" I committed to only when G1 is in use... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org