Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of
 SRS0=u27IcG=EK=basetechnology.com=jack@yourhostingaccount.com designates
 65.254.253.58 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <546EEBB62CE34AEB97E8AAD4BABBC906@JackKrupansky>
From: "Jack Krupansky" <jack@basetechnology.com>
To: <dev@lucene.apache.org>
References: <4FD02570.7060309@elyograg.org>
 <CAF=Pa59UGnkdC+fSS8KYGGhK1uAzQ+ZGGhrmonDfQhR3Cr3vvg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAF=Pa59UGnkdC+fSS8KYGGhK1uAzQ+ZGGhrmonDfQhR3Cr3vvg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How much Lucene 4.0 capability is NOT in Solr 4.0?
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:59:12 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
Sender: "Jack Krupansky" <jack@basetechnology.com>

"the codec stuff is all useable from solr out of the box"

Is there any doc for that, I mean setting codec config settings from the 
Solr level?

-- Jack Krupansky

-----Original Message----- 
From: Ryan McKinley
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 5:49 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How much Lucene 4.0 capability is NOT in Solr 4.0?

DocValues (CSF) are not yet supported in solr:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2753

There is not yet a plan for how this would be incorporated.

As Robert already said, the codec stuff is all useable from solr out of the 
box

ryan


On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Shawn Heisey <solr@elyograg.org> wrote:
> I was perusing email from this list and came across LUCENE-4069.  If it is
> as good as it says, it looks like a fit for a couple of the fields in my
> index.
>
> I will admit that I don't entirely understand all of what's being said
> regarding codecs, postings, and other such terms, but because I run a
> distributed Solr index, I do understand that not all of Lucene's
> functionality is available in Solr.  My question: How much of all the new
> bells and whistles in 4.0 will be available in Solr without custom coding?
>  In this specific instance, I would like to be able to use LUCENE-4069, 
> but
> my question is more general than that -- will it be possible to take the
> official Solr 4.0 (or 4.1, or 4.2) download and specify codecs and other
> details on a per-field basis?
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org