Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of uwe@thetaphi.de designates
 188.138.97.18 as permitted sender)
From: "Uwe Schindler" <uwe@thetaphi.de>
To: <dev@lucene.apache.org>
References: 
 <CAPf_=6dyMCjCzNgBn_hm2QQrqYAcVtKSVn39ggTa8hCk5=jRDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM21Rt8qrKDcFmQQJX0u8UrMC29D+yvOh94+svWbA55sYm0kHQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAM21Rt8qrKDcFmQQJX0u8UrMC29D+yvOh94+svWbA55sYm0kHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Suppressing list doesn't take effect when -Dtests.postingsformat
 is used
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 09:54:09 +0200
Message-ID: <001501cd415e$0f07e7c0$2d17b740$@thetaphi.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQKJWaQ2VUbauPz0odCmqznQ5CAIwgLVnpt3lVlbSQA=
Content-Language: de

> The actual source of the problem is that suppression applies to =
codec.getName
> and enforcing a TEST_POSTINGSFORMAT means  Lucene40Codec is created
> which always returns Lucene40 from getName(). A simple fix would be to =
allow
> changing the returned name for Lucene40.

I don't think we should do this! Making it un-final destroys the whole =
concept behind it. SPI relies on a constant name and this enforces the =
codec API to behave correctly. If it can suddenly return a different =
name the consistency between codec file format and loaded codec is no =
longer preserved.

Uwe


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org