lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Muir <>
Subject Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 4.0-ALPHA
Date Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:51:18 GMT
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Steven A Rowe <> wrote:
> I ran on Windows+Cygwin.  Several "***WARNING***: javadocs want
to fail!" messages.

these are ok and expected, it means there exist some public/protected
classes without javadocs :)
we cant totally enforce this yet, until we fix some modules [core,
grouping, highlighter, queries, queryparser, spatial, test-framework]
to have javadocs for all public/protected classes. So these modules
only enforce this currently at "package" level until they are fixed.
See lucene/build.xml line 191. when a module is fixed, we then turn it
on at "class" level and hudson will fail if anyone adds classes
without javadocs.
And when all modules are fixed we should start warning at method/class
member level and reiterate until all public/protected stuff has
javadocs (like the style guidelines say!)

> And also javadocs warnings that did trigger a failure under Solr:

Thanks: I don't know whats going on here. It might just be an issue
with the smoketester (i only hacked it up to work on linux, it could
have bugs on windows!), because we dont see these warnings from Uwe's


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message