lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Use of @Slow annotation on tests
Date Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:43:11 GMT
+1

Perhaps an ant target "quicktest" or something instead of the -D? I don't
have any strong feelings which would be better so whatever the people doing
the work think.

But running "ant test" on my 2009-vintage laptop has been painful lately

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Dawid Weiss
> <dawid.weiss@cs.put.poznan.pl> wrote:
>> Yep, sure. All these test groups can be triggered via system
>> properties so sure -- a weekly build could enable the @Weekly group
>> and run a full test. I don't know how heavy it is on the filesystem
>> though (and if Jenkins can handle this particular test).
>>
>
> Its very heavy on disk too. But i dont see an alternative for this test.
>
> if only it were like Test2BDocs
>
> --
> lucidimagination.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message