lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris Male (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4101) Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED
Date Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:39:43 GMT


Chris Male commented on LUCENE-4101:

bq. We could, alternatively, not make these TYPE_XXX's public (then their names matter much
less!) ... but I think it's useful having them public so an app can start from a known type
and then change it.

Yeah for many of the reasons Robert mentions in LUCENE-4126, we need to let users work from
a pre-existing type and make the changes they want.  

Okay I can live with TYPE_NOT_STORED.
> ---------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-4101
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.0, 5.0
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4101.patch, LUCENE-4101.patch, LUCENE-4101.patch, LUCENE-4101.patch,
> Spinoff from LUCENE-3312.
> For 4.0 I think we should simplify the sugar field APIs by requiring
> that you add a StoredField if you want to store the field.  Expert users
> can still make a custom FieldType that both stores and indexes...

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message