Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 18:35:41 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Simon Willnauer (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <835230127.12548.1337798141289.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2443) Don't assume IntsRef offset is 0
 after postings bulk read
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13281783#comment-13281783 ] 

Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2443:
-----------------------------------------

seems like this is invalid now no?
                
> Don't assume IntsRef offset is 0 after postings bulk read
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2443
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2443
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core/index
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Yonik found 2 places where we assume the ints starts at offset=0 after bulk read -- we can't do this because in general a codec can give us a slice into private int[] arrays, eg int block codec.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org