lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steven Rowe (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2510) migrate solr analysis factories to analyzers module
Date Fri, 04 May 2012 14:56:48 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13268413#comment-13268413
] 

Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2510:
-------------------------------------

Chris, before the changes made here, solrj did not have a dependency on lucene-core, but now
it does.  Is it possible to move the dependency to solr-core?

The Maven build failed today because of this <https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/476/consoleText>:

{quote}
[INFO] Error for project: Apache Solr Solrj (during install)
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Compilation failure
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/checkout/solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/common/ResourceLoader.java:[25,71]
package org.apache.lucene.analysis.util does not exist
{quote}

The short-term fix for the Maven build would be just adding a lucene-core dependency to the
solrj POM.
                
> migrate solr analysis factories to analyzers module
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2510
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2510
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: modules/analysis
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2510-parent-classes.patch, LUCENE-2510-resourceloader-bw.patch,
LUCENE-2510.patch, LUCENE-2510.patch, LUCENE-2510.patch
>
>
> In LUCENE-2413 all TokenStreams were consolidated into the analyzers module.
> This is a good step, but I think the next step is to put the Solr factories into the
analyzers module, too.
> This would make analyzers artifacts plugins to both lucene and solr, with benefits such
as:
> * users could use the old analyzers module with solr, too. This is a good step to use
real library versions instead of Version for backwards compat.
> * analyzers modules such as smartcn and icu, that aren't currently available to solr
users due to large file sizes or dependencies, would be simple optional plugins to solr and
easily available to users that want them.
> Rough sketch in this thread: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/3465a0e55ba94d58/solr_and_analyzers_module
> Practically, I havent looked much and don't really have a plan for how this will work
yet, so ideas are very welcome.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message